Glenfarclas 1974…Sometimes There Is No Substitute For Age

In the past I have espoused the idea that age does not necessarily equate to quality and that young whiskies can be just as good.  I haven’t changed my position on this, but I think I need to clarify it somewhat.  First, this isn’t an absolute rule – there are always exceptions.  Second, while young whiskies can and many do hold their own and very good, there is a depth of flavor in some older whiskies that just cannot be duplicated in a younger whisky.

This leads me to the whisky at hand here, Glenfarclas 1974.  Just as an FYI for you before reading my impressions, I like big, powerful whiskies and this one certainly is.

Stats:
Distilled in 1974 and bottled on December 12, 2005
57.4% ABV
~$250.00

Color: Black tea, reminiscent of an imperial IPA (if you like to knock back a pint or two)

Nose: BIG sherry, malty, oak, hope its not over cooked, leather, dark and brooding, nutmeg, Christmas cake, ginger cookies, layers and layers, a faint bubble gum sweetness , maybe pez? Yum! Can sit and nose this for hours.

Palate: Just like the nose advertises, dark Christmas spices, not as viscous as I was expecting, oaky bite, nicely integrated sherry – if you like sherry bombs that is, love the ABV! Little spicy, malt, kabocha cake, prunes, picking up some bitterness.

Finish: Long sherry and spice.

Comments:  The character and flavors of this whisky are complex and layered.  Complexity that I just don’t taste in “younger” whiskies in general.  But you gotta like ’em dark, dense and heavy, oh ya…and with a healthy helping of sherry, it might be a little over cooked in the cask, its right on the line for me, but it’s an interesting, challenging and damn tasty dram.  The nose was fantastic, I actually spent a couple of minutes nosing the remnants of my empty glass like a strung out drug addict.  Unfortunately for me the only thing left in the bottle is vapors.

2 Comments

Filed under Glenfarclas

2 responses to “Glenfarclas 1974…Sometimes There Is No Substitute For Age

  1. I’ve been contemplating the 1973 Family Cask Farclas… that being the year I was born. Big bucks though..

    This 1974 cask sounds INCREDIBLE!

  2. Peter

    I’ve contemplated getting my birth-year Glenfarclas as well…tho’ I think the only way that’s going to happen is if I pony up the $28 for a tiny Master of Malt sample, which of course, would be decidedly less satisfying.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s